Contemporary European immigrants face unique sociocultural and legal concerns that go beyond issues of race, class, national origin, and accent discrimination. These concerns are not adequately addressed by laws protecting groups based on their national origins or ancestries. Scholarship and public discussions are silent on this topic. As a result, European-born Americans fall through the cracks in critical legal theory, not fitting into any of the traditional analytical frameworks. No labels apply to them. Like their predecessors a century ago, they are expected to assimilate easily. At the same time, people assume that European-born Americans always and uniformly benefit from access to white privilege. In reality, European-born Americans oscillate between being visible as foreigners and fading into the invisible “white” norm. A closer analysis of their culturally constructed identity—as illustrated by looking at employment discrimination—exposes the artificiality of the concept of “whiteness.” A more accurate understanding of European immigrants’ experience also calls for a more holistic and consistent definition and application of “national origin” protections under Title VII and of “race”-based safeguards under § 1981. Looking more critically at the European immigrant experience points to the benefits of separating the concept of foreignness from the study of “race,” which often gets conflated with notions of national origin and ethnicity.
Responses are scholarly reactions to Articles appearing in the Tulane Law Review. The Review will only accept submissions of this type for Articles appearing within the last three volumes of the Review(or with an abstract appearing on this Web site). See information and guidelines.
- Visiting Professor, Temple University Beasley School of Law, Japan Campus. J.D., Columbia University School of Law; B.A., Yale University.
- 88 Tul. L. Rev. 559 (2014)